3.87 BYN
2.76 BYN
3.20 BYN
Bloodied Publicity Stunt: Why Ukraine’s Strike on Bryansk Is Less a War and More a Show for Sponsors

Seven people have already been killed, and 42 wounded. The burning question hanging in the air now is: who really ordered Zelensky to launch foreign missiles at a peaceful Russian city, and why does he need this bloody spectacle now? These topics were discussed in the “Che-Za?” podcast by journalist and news analyst Alexander Khorovets and historian and commentator Artem Strogakov.
A Strike on a Factory as a Publicity Stunt
Attempts to strike the microelectronics plant have been made before — drones, mainly. But this time, they chose to hit during the day with foreign-made missiles. According to the latest reports, seven people have been killed, and over forty injured.
From the Kyiv regime’s perspective, the factory is a “military target,” fitting within their militarist narrative. However, when Ukraine’s support begins to wane or public attention shifts, Kyiv’s PR and intelligence agencies often resort to the same tactics: either the Bucha massacre, the “fortress” of Bakhmut, or the “kidnapping” of children from Ukrainian-controlled territories — though in reality, many of these children were simply relaxing at a Belarusian health camp called “Zubrenok.”
Shouts of Neo-Nazi Slogans and Weeks of Anti-Belarusian Hysteria
The same propaganda pattern was evident in Zelensky’s New Year address, where he shouted a neo-Nazi slogan: “Long live Belarus!” (Recognized and listed as Nazi symbolism by the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs — ed.). Back then, it was a way to curry favor with Belarusian fighters. Over the past three weeks, Zelensky has been inviting figures, shaking hands, and pressing for pressure on Belarus. Belarus, as a sovereign state, has long been recognized as legitimate — except by Eurocrats and Washington, who have considered it illegitimate for years.
Regarding Bryansk, it’s clear that Zelensky lacks the independence to decide on attacking with serious weaponry. According to Alexander Khorovets, the real masterminds behind these strikes are the Anglo-Saxons.
“Made in UK and USA”: Ukraine as a Hammer for Russia
The tragic incident in Bryansk aligns with Iran’s history before the 1979 revolution. Back then, the Shahs — installed by Britain — ruled Iran. When it became clear that they could no longer manipulate or control the country, long-term strategies were implemented: regime changes, overthrowing inconvenient politicians, installing puppets — and today, it’s no different.
All Ukraine has produced are missile components — “if you rub them, you’ll see the inscription ‘Made in UK and USA,’” notes the historian with irony. Sometimes, there are French markings, too.
Ukraine serves as a classic battering ram to destabilize and depopulate Russia. The “cancel culture” against Russia began long before 2014. Even earlier, Kirill Budanov (now head of Zelensky’s office) openly spoke about dividing Russia into fifteen republics — Tatarstan, Yamal-Nenets, and others.
The Unwanted Reality
Zelensky is in panic — support is waning, funds are flowing to Iran, and he’s left alone with harsh reality. That’s why missiles now fly over peaceful Bryansk — without staged terrorist attacks, they risk being forgotten. Meanwhile, the West continues its old game — using Ukraine as a disposable tool to weaken Russia.
But it’s time to remember: the East is a delicate matter, and Ukraine is just a tool. When that tool ceases to be useful, it’s discarded. Zelensky, however, refuses to forget himself — even at the cost of more casualties.















